The Solar System’s moons are intriguing objects for exploration. Especially moons like Europa and Enceladus. Their subsurface oceans make them primary targets in the search for life.
But why not send one spacecraft to visit several moons? NASA’s about to launch its Lucy mission which will visit 8 separate asteroids. Could the same be done for a mission to multiple moons?
For a spacecraft to do that, it would have to do a little dance with the notorious three-body problem, which makes a stubborn partner. A new study presents a possible way to do that.
Missions like Galileo and Cassini were able to gather some data on the moons of Jupiter and Saturn. But they performed distant flybys; they never orbited the moons. It’s tricky sending a spacecraft to visit and orbit different moons around the same planet because of all the gravitational forces involved. A spacecraft with unlimited propellant could use brute force to enter and exit orbits. But that’s not how space travel works. Everything is launched from Earth on rockets, at great expense, and fuel must be carefully husbanded.
A new study looks at a method to move a spacecraft between lunar orbits without using mission-busting quantities of fuel. The title of the paper is “Transfer design between neighbourhoods of planetary moons in the circular restricted three-body problem: The Moon-to-Moon Analytical Transfer Method.” The lead author of the paper is David Canales from the School of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Purdue University.
The “circular restricted three-body problem” is one of those vexing aspects of space travel in need of a stronger solution. In the case of transferring a spacecraft between different moons. the planet, the moons, and the spacecraft create a complicated gravitational situation that’s difficult to navigate. Especially when the moons are travelling at different velocities, and on different orbital planes.
For a better understanding of the three-body problem, watch this video.
Their solution is called the Moon-to-Moon Analytical Transfer (MMAT) Method. MMAT is a general methodology for transferring spacecraft between moons “…within the context of the circular restricted three-body problem..” the authors write.
“A simplified model enables analytical constraints to efficiently determine the feasibility of a transfer between two different moons moving in the vicinity of a common planet. In particular, connections between the periodic orbits of such two different moons are achieved,” they write. In their paper, they present two case studies: one for the Jovian system and one for the Uranian system.
The authors explain that other researchers have come up with solutions to the three-body problem. But they say that these solutions are unsatisfactory for different reasons. For example, some solutions assume that the moons are on coplanar orbits, which may not be true. Some solutions require too much fuel and restrict mission design. And some modelled solutions don’t hold true when modelled at higher resolutions. They write that solutions must be “…sometimes adjusted on a case-by-case basis.”
Their MMAT method is more effective. They describe it as “…an alternative general methodology for transfer design between moons applicable to any given system;”
The specific math behind the MMAT method is beyond this article’s scope. Interested readers can explore the paper for themselves. For the rest of us, the paper’s conclusion explains it best.
In their conclusion, the authors drive home the point that transfers from moon to moon are extraordinarily complex maneuvers. “Trajectory design for transfers between different moons moving in the vicinity of a common planet is a balance between diverse constraints, priorities and requirements to enable trajectory design for successful missions.” The solution involves the use of libration points in the system. “The analysis supports transfers between libration point
orbits near different moons,” they write.
One of the strengths of the authors’ MMAT system is that it doesn’t assume co-planar orbits for separate moons. For that reason, the MMAT produces better solutions than previous methods. They write that “…the MMAT method yields a phasing of the moons that is consistent with the actual moon orbits, given that the moons are located in their true orbital planes at a certain epoch.”
The MMAT appears to produce solutions for visiting multiple moons that don’t require the same high velocities and long travel times as previous solutions. The MMAT produces “…transfers between Lyapunov orbits near Ganymede and Europa, as well as transfers between halo orbits in the vicinity of Titania and Oberon, using only a single maneuver.”
They conclude by saying that “…the MMAT method locates cost-effective impulsive transfers between key moons of the solar system.”
Missions to icy moons are on the minds of the people at NASA and the ESA. The ESA is developing the Jupiter Icy Moons Explorer (JUICE) which will launch in August 2022 and enter orbit around Ganymede in September 2032. And NASA is developing the Europa Clipper mission, scheduled to be launched in October 2024. The Europa Clipper won’t even orbit Europa itself. Instead, it’ll orbit Jupiter and will perform flybys of the moon Europa. (It’ll still do good science.)
What will the future exploration of the Galilean moons look like if the MMAT is effective? Will there be more complex missions that can visit two moons or more?
When NASA decides on a mission, they select it from a group of competing mission proposals. The ones that aren’t selected are sometimes forgotten, and sometimes they return in a more evolved form to compete again. For example, NASA recently announced two missions to Venus, called DAVINCI+ and VERITAS. But their selection meant that another mission to Jupiter’s moon Io lost out. That mission is called Io Volcano Observer (IVO.)
But if NASA, and other space agencies, can use MMAT to master transferring spacecraft between moons, things will look different in the future. A spacecraft could be sent to investigate multiple Galilean moons. Maybe missions like NASA’s JUICE and IVO missions could be somehow combined, and IVO wouldn’t be relegated.
MMAT won’t make multi-moon missions simple. There’s complexity and chaos at every turn.
But it might make them feasible.